|
|
|
Implementing the Nagoya Protocol on ABS: A Hypothetical
Case Study on Enforcing Benefit Sharing in Norway
By
Morten Walløe Tvedt and Ole Kristian Fauchald The Journal
of World Intellectual Property, Vol 14, No 5, 2011, pp.
383-402.
In October 2010, the Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic
Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising From Their
Utilization (NP) was adopted at the Conference of the Parties (COP-10) of the
Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). The NP establishes rules on measures
to be taken by user countries in the context of access and benefit sharing
(ABS). The future success of ABS as embedded in CBD and the Nagoya Protocol
depends on their implementation at a national level. The binding rules of CBD
and NP have in common that they need to be transformed into national legal and
political contexts to establish a functional system for ABS. This article
addresses measures that are needed in the international regime to secure
adoption and implementation of user-country measures which are compatible with
provider-country legislation. It analyses one current example of user-country
legislation: the recently adopted Norwegian legislation, for the purpose of
finding options for and obstacles to implementing obligations in the CBD and
the NP in national law and in actual practice. One part of the ABS challenge is
that obligations in the CBD and the NP apply to states, whereas the actual
users of genetic resources are mostly private or public enterprises: companies,
universities or other institutions. Despite showing a promising start, far from
all challenges of a functional ABS system are solved.
>
Purchase article |
|
|
|
|