


Summary of Working Paper No. 124-1999
IV.3.3
“Shipping and Marine Insurance on the Northern Sea Route: Conclusions 1993-1998”
By Edgar Gold, John A. Cantello, and Peter L. Wright, Oceans Institute of
Canada, Halifax, NS, Canada
As indicated by the title, this Working Paper contains the conclusions of
INSROP Sub-Project IV.3.3 which examined the feasibility of marine insurance
coverage for shipping on the Northern Sea Route (NSR) during the period 1993-1998.
Although it was quite apparent from its beginnings that the NSR would never
become a practical reality if shipowners would not send their vessels through this
navigational shortcut, the importance of obtaining adequate risk coverage for
such navigation was probably not fully realized when INSROP first commenced. The
principal terms of reference of INSROP Sub-Project IV.3.3 consisted of an
examination of the marine insurance industry in order to assess if regular
navigation on the NSR would be insurable. For the first four years of the Sub-Project,
this was the principal task which concluded that marine insurers would be
interested in providing NSR coverage if the shipping industry would use the route.
However, in 1997-1998 the Sub-Project
’s terms of reference were somewhat expanded in order to include a preliminary
assessment of the shipping industry’s interest in utilizing the NSR. It has become clear that it was not
appropriate to simply examine marine insurance aspects without, at least, making such a
preliminary assessment. Accordingly, this Working Paper not only summarizes the
conclusions of the Sub-Project’s marine insurance research work but also provides information on how the NSR
idea is being viewed by the major shipping centres—especially in Asia, where the maximum benefit from the NSR could be derived.
Research results and data for the work carried out during the period 1993-1998
are provided in terms of: Northern Sea Route Initial Knowledge Base;
Environmental Research; Commercial Aspects Research; and, Political and Legal Aspects
Research. This leads to a
“Conclusions” section in which a series of thirteen questions arising out of the Sub-Project’s work receive responses. The overall conclusions reached indicate that whilst
the major insurance markets are quite positive in providing adequate risk
coverage for NSR navigation, the shipping industry—i.e. the potential major users—are not yet committed to the new route. Nevertheless, it is also concluded
that if one or more of the existing alternative sea routes would experience
certain problems, that the NSR would become more attractive. Furthermore, the
shipping industry itself needs to carry out further, specific research on the actual
economic advantages of the shorter NSR over other routes. This type of research
will be made much easier through the very significant data base accumulated by
INSROP.