Skedsmo defended his thesis at the University of Oslo (UiO) at the end of last week, 21 April 2017. He first presented his trial lecture titled ‘The environment as a topic in the anthropology of postsocialism,’ before moving on to the defense of his dissertation.

The problems of foreign aid

Professor Axel Borchgrevink. Photo: Karoline FlåmIn his thesis, Skedsmo focuses on two specific case studies to show how environmental politics is becoming increasingly ‘Europeanized’ in post-Soviet countries such as Armenia. The first case study concerns a proposed mining project, which many members of the environmentally attuned public were opposed to. Years of opposition led to lawsuits within Armenia and culminated in an appeal to the Aarhus Convention’s compliance committee.

The other case study is a Norwegian foreign aid project in Armenia. Much like the Aarhus Convention, it was put in place ostensibly to promote ‘European values and practices’ in Armenian environmental management. Associate Professor Tanya Richardson. Photo: Karoline FlåmAs Skedmo’s analysis shows, however, the goals of the project were increasingly defined by the donor, rather than by local needs. It also failed to address lack of local support in Armenia. The result was a widening discrepancy between how the project was presented ‘on paper,’ and how it actually unfolded on the ground.

Highly relevant

Skedsmo spoke on both of these issues during his defense, and was particularly commended by the adjudicating committee for producing such an ‘empirically rich, innovative’ and not least ‘politically relevant’ academic work.

I myself have personal experience of bridging the gap between the role as a development practitioner and a development scholar, so the subject of this dissertation really resonated with me; it has been a really interesting read,” said panel member Professor Axel Borchgrevink of the Department of International Studies and Interpreting at Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences.

"The case of the development project is extreme, but at the same time highly familiar and relevant,” he added.

The other two members of the panel were Associate Professor Dr. Tanya Richardson of the Faculty of Art at the Wilfrid Laurier University in Ontario, Canada, and Professor Christian Krohn-Hansen of the Department of Social Anthropology at UiO. The disputation was led by Professor Odd Are Berkaak at UiO. Knut Gunnar Nustad, head of the Department of Social Anthropology at UiO, has been Skedsmo’s academic advisor during his work with the thesis.

Pål Wilter Skedsmo. Photo: Karoline Flåm